Telemedicine
As telecommunication technology has advanced and costs have
declined over the past decade, there has been a steady growth in
telemedicine. Much of this growth, however, has been in the form of
feasibility studies and pilot trials. As a result there is little
convincing evidence of the cost effectiveness of many applications,
apart from teleradiology (box). This paper reviews recent evidence and
describes clinical applications where there is early evidence that
telemedicine is not only of clinical benefit but cost effective too.
What is telemedicine?
Telemedicine
is an umbrella term that encompasses any medical activity involving an
element of distance. In its commonly understood sense, in which a
doctor-patient interaction involves telecommunication, it goes back at
least to the use of ship to shore radio for giving medical advice to sea
captains. A few years ago the term telemedicine began to be supplanted
by the term telehealth, which was thought to be more “politically
correct,” but in the past year or so this too has been overtaken by even
more fashionable terms such as online health and e-health.
The
implementation of telemedicine in routine health services is being
impeded by the lack of scientific evidence for its clinical and cost
effectiveness. The British government has stated that, without such
evidence, telemedicine will not be widely introduced. Policymakers have been warned against recommending investment in unevaluated technologies.
Recent advances in telemedicine can therefore be considered to be shown
by studies that have obtained evidence of cost effectiveness
Comments
Post a Comment